Note you will have to buy Office: Mac since that version is different from Office for Windows though I tend to run the Windows version of Outlook on my Mac through Parallels over the Mac version of Outlook but your mileage and hers may vary.
The content you requested has been removed. Ask a question. Quick access. Search related threads. Remove From My Forums. Asked by:. Archived Forums. Expression Web and SuperPreview. Sign in to vote. Hi I bought a copy of Expression web for windows about 2 years ago for my daughter.
Many thanks in advance. Take our short survey. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Collectives on Stack Overflow. Learn more. View website as if on a Mac Ask Question. Asked 10 years, 4 months ago. Active 10 years, 4 months ago. Viewed 3k times. Improve this question.
Samantha Samantha 29 1 1 gold badge 2 2 silver badges 3 3 bronze badges. If you're serious about testing then you should just buy a low end Mac - second hand Mac Minis are pretty cheap on eBay.
You can try Safari for windows. It's not a port but it's quite close. Add a comment. With a dynamic system, the work is done in real time, on every served page. I am not really locked in to DWTs. I could easily adopt one of the popular template systems or build my own. I just don't see the need to bother. A Web site is a collection of files that are interrelated. The collection of files represents a project.
The single-folder organization is helpful because backups and archives are as simple as they could be. It is vastly better than using a standalone editor with no project context and there are a lot of such programs. I rely on EW's handling of projects and, for now, do not want to walk away from it. After six years in the Microsoft camp and the release of FrontPage , the editor had evolved to be closer to the Visual Studio style. In I considered it excellent and today I consider it very good.
I have never felt a strong need to use a different editor for my code. I still consider this a strong point of EW4. That said, a key feature of a programmer's IDE is extensive knowledge of the language s being used. This is where EW4 is weakest because, as a dead project, it is not getting updated as languages advance.
The fact that I continue to use EW4 tells you that I am getting journeyman's work out of the EW editor and could continue to use it as is. Nonetheless, my productivity is falling a bit because after building sites for so long I have a deep reservoir of code with hundreds of functions and classes and methods.
I confess to a certain amount of laziness with respect to EW4. It meets most of my needs, is straightforward, and I'm very used to it. If I decided to do something differently, perhaps to abandon the DWT in favor of another method, I'd have to consider what that meant for all the sites I've deployed for clients. Those sites are running fine and it's very easy for me to install updates to my core software at any time, usually with no disruption.
0コメント